The Metaverse is still not ready for virtual weddings and legal proceedings


As the global Web3 ecosystem continued to evolve at a breakneck pace, the varied usage instances related to this area of ​​interest also evolved. In a further pending enhancement, a high-ranking Singaporean government minister recently noted that authorized marriage procedures, court litigation, and government corporations may in the future be carried out using Metaverse platforms.

While delivering a keynote speech at Singapore’s TechLaw Fest 2022 late last month, the country’s second regulatory minister, Edwin Tong, reportedly said he would not be surprised if, sooner or later, events Intimate matters such as the solemnization of marriages to In addition to permitted conflicts “may occur in the metaverse”, including:

“It will not be unthinkable that apart from marriage registration, various government corporations can be quickly accessed online through the Metaverse. There’s no reason why the identical can’t be performed for authorized companies. The pandemic has already proven to us that even the decision to contest – once seen as a bodily and tactile process […] will take place online.

Explaining his position, Tong used a hypothetical example of a conflict involving an accident on a construction website, which he said could very well be viewed in a 3D environment using augmented reality technology, thus allowing greater reinvention of the accident. “You can stand in the exact tunnel or the oil containment facility to examine the conflict,” he added.

A hybrid perspective corresponding to this, Tong believes, can make the dispute adjudication process extremely convenient and environmentally friendly for governments around the world.

Could digital court proceedings become the norm?

According to Joseph Collement, general counsel for cryptocurrency commerce and developer of wallets, dematerializing government businesses that require in-person presence is the most consistent next step for nations around the world, especially because the world is moving from a similar age to a digital one over this post covid period. He added:

“Nowadays, about a third of authorized agreements in the world are signed electronically. Subsequently, it is not surprising to see fashionable nations like Singapore undertake global applied sciences like the metaverse for presidential companies. The same consideration should apply to some civil court proceedings, which are nevertheless subject to undue delays due to backlogs. While justice is delayed, the events involved must generally endure.

A similar view is shared by Alexander Firsov, Web3.0 director of Sensorium, an AI-based Metaverse platform. He told Cointelegraph that as an area dedicated to bridging the gap between the real world and digital experiences, it only makes sense that the metaverse will transform in the future into a medium where legal proceedings can take place. .

In his view, by embracing immersive applied science, digital court proceedings won’t feel much different from real-life events. In fact, he believes that using photorealistic avatars can bring a level of humanization and presence that online conferences fail to achieve. Finally, Firsov noted that methods of justice around the world are notoriously incremental, expensive, and that the metaverse will help address these inefficiencies, including:

“The metaverse can have a constructive impression with regard to the work of law enforcement companies and various authorized entities on points corresponding to cooperation, file retention and transmission of information, because it holds the power to improve life processes using the rising applied sciences corresponding to blockchain.

Not everyone seems to be bought into the concept

Dimitry Mihaylov, an AI researcher, professional UN entrepreneur, and Affiliate Professor at Nationwide College Singapore, told Cointelegraph that the main drawback when talking about digitally facilitated authorized procedures is that of intellectual property-based laws ( PI) – since geographical boundaries do not. question in ongoing proceedings in the metaverse, at least as of but. He defined:

“Once you have obtained a patent, it is only legitimate within a specific territory. But, with the Metaverse, it’s going to be used by people all over the world. Individuals can unwittingly violate legal guidelines by using a patent in the metaverse that is outside of its legalization space. It is here that the authorities concerned want to know who owns the intellectual property and under which legal jurisdiction it falls.

The second situation, according to him, concerns the collection and possession of information. This is because mainstream tech conglomerates have a long history of misusing their buyers’ information, and because of this, it will be critical that laws regarding the storage and use of permitted information on the metaverse be worked out before any court. legal proceedings may take place in this regard.

Collement believes that a physical courtroom presents options that cannot be replicated in the metaverse. For example, cross-examining a witness before a jury to attack their credibility is a crucial technique in some cases. Even with superior video conferencing, some key clues and details of a witness interview will be missed by the jury. He added:

“It is not clear to me that the Metaverse is capable of hosting trials. Uncertainty remains as to the applicability of judgments held by Metaverse in countries that are members of the Hague Conference but have not yet issued any guidelines or legal directives regarding these digital procedures.

Additionally, Mihaylov noted that the issue of copyright is somehow relevant in this regard as it protects digital works in many countries. He explained that these days, companies like Google are extremely quick in their copyright actions and block any websites that infringe their rights. “The copyright covers over 100 countries, and it’s very close to the model the metaverse should use. But it certainly hasn’t worked yet, and no such precedent has been set to date,” he added.

Is abundance ready to simply accept legal proceedings on the Metaverse?

Mattan Erder, affiliate general counsel at public blockchain infrastructure provider Orbs, told Cointelegraph that as things stand, it’s really about whether people are actually ready to consider the end result of this. happens on the metaverse as being real, especially from an authorized point of view. In his view, most people are pretty indifferent to a reality where they will one day see trials decide a person’s course of action, including:

“I think we have some time now before these things get real. However, the longer people stay in the metaverse, the closer we get to psychological change. There are several elements that need further improvements before it’s really possible to have all of these basic social facilities there.

In Erder’s view, the situation mentioned here is one that is normally handled by governments almost solely. Subsequently, it makes sense that many do not step forward thinking that any of these changes will return any time soon. He believes that authorized methods have a transparent choice as to the will of the bodily presence of all persons involved in a trial, including:

“Most people believe that being in the same room with someone, corresponding to a witness, and looking them in the eye, seeing their mannerisms, etc., is essential in assessing their credibility. Democracies give defendants the right to confront witnesses and evidence against them instantly, and litigants have the right to confront each other and choice/jury.

Finally, a key factor when it comes to people and governments engaging in Metaverse-based legal proceedings and marriages is their definition of reality. So far, Erder thinks that because the metaverse becomes such a big part of people’s lives, the issues that occur there will start to matter to people. “The metaverse will become a microcosm of human society where there will be a pure need for issues such as dispute resolution,” he concluded.

The long term seems to be “Metavers prepared”

Similarly, quite recently, the South Korean government announced that it was actively taking steps to bolster its Metaverse ambitions by setting aside $177 million from its coffers. The country is trying to design a platform for its people that provides access to a great selection of presidential businesses in a very digital trend.

Also in July, infrastructure company Metaverse Condense closed a round of seed funding to pursue the event of 3D live streaming technology. The know-how underlying the agency’s digital offering uses “an imaginative and prescient state-of-the-art laptop computer, automatic study, and proprietary streaming infrastructure to capture and integrate live 3D video (video 3.0). ” Before long, the agency hopes to bring this unique live video expertise to many Metaverse video games and mobile features, as well as other platforms created using Unity or the Unreal Engine.

Earlier this year, the Metaverse platform Decentraland declared itself the honor of hosting the world’s first online wedding ceremony on the Metaverse, with the event bringing together more than 2,000 visitors. The proceedings were administered and celebrated by the regulatory agency Rose Regulation Group.


About Author

Comments are closed.